The “union of the rights”: taboo, impasse or Arlesian?
ANALYSIS – Everyone is sent back to their challenges: for LR, how to bounce back?…
The “union of the rights”: taboo, impasse or Arlesian?
ANALYSIS – Everyone is sent back to their challenges: for LR, how to bounce back? For the RN, how to win? For Reconquest!, how to exist? And if nothing replaces neither the project nor the incarnation, the question of strategy cannot be eluded by anyone.
The LR leaders forbid it; Marine Le Pen never believed in it; Eric Zemmour never ceases to mock those he claims to reconcile. Union of rights, a taboo for the former, a dead end for the latter, remorse for the third. And for many voters, an Arlesian. The excitement caused by the front page of The Wrong was therefore predictable.
The magazine of the rightoutside the wallsled by Arthur de Watrigant brought together around the same table the bosses of the young people of the Republicans, the National Rally and Reconquest!. The indignant reaction of a handful of elected LRs, Xavier Bertrand in the lead, reveals a double paradox.
First paradox: never has there been so much question of “redialpolicy, it has never been announced, desired and encouraged to such an extent; but, at the same time, the borders to the right of the partisan landscape remain considered sacred.
Read alsoÉric Zemmour: “The union of the rights is the only way out”
Second paradox: never has the Lepenist party been so integrated into institutional life…
